I have no problem with voiding warranty if a gun is opened or altered by a customer. I fully stand behind this policy. W2 Program Dodge County Wi Tax there.

However, refusing to sell parts to a customer because of some silly insurance liability clause is unacceptable. If this is true, I would avoid that product. I also feel insulted that such bad scopes are included in a combo. How can we combat that? -Chuck I agree we open a rifle, you void the warranty thats as it should be. Unfortunately no business can operate without liability insurance. There is no way the fellow who is putting up his own financial butt on the line to create Hatsan USA wanted this absurd restriction.

Buy Burden Of Proof - With Infotrac (Custom) 3rd edition. Burden Of Proof - With Infotrac (Custom) - 3rd edition ISBN13. Burden of Proof includes chapters focusing on.

Like yourself it only matters to us who want to deburr & lube (The MOD 95 I opened had a dry spring like a Diana by the way) and repair wear items. The vast majority of customers send out their rifles for repair anyway. The CEO of Hatsan USA had a choice and choose to make it work as best he could. As far as the scope, on the 95 I broke the front lens free and focused it to 10 yards and stuck it on a friends short range plinker. Like the Crosman Titan OEM non AO scopes they are a doorstop.

Dan Georgescu Semiologie Medicala Pdf Files. I strongly agree with what Chuck said. While liability insurance is a fact of life if you run a business(I know, as I pay plenty of it for little benifit, except to compenstate stupid in the event stupid exercises his God given right to hone his skills) there must be ways to work around it. How about a disclaimer worded by a clever team of lawyers perhaps? Even though most of the airgun market does not tune or repair their guns, the ones that do, are serious airgunners who due to the internet, set the tone for a lot of that market.

If the manufacturer cannot, or will not, provide parts to repair their guns and the guns exihibit quality issues that this one seems too, doesn’t that reinforce the notion that many airguns are throw aways, and should be treated as such? IMO, this is why some airguns have a hard time being accepted by mainstream shooters who expect their stuff to work when brand new,including that scope packaged with this unit. Crosman is able to work around the parts issue, except for the gas rams which they won’t sell.I suspect that is because they will end up in their competitors products, not because someone would hurt themselves installing one in a Gamo for instance? Personally, the parts deal will now cause me to cross Hatsan off the list of affordable airguns to tinker with, along with the Gamo products as I have already done so, years ago.

Hi Mark I am going to walk out on some very thin ice here, and make a comment based on information that might just be old. Things change, but I have no information that something like this has changed. My understanding is that a manufacturer is not required to offer a warranty; if he offers a warranty, it cannot be a total/complete warranty – it must be a “limited” warranty, and, once offered, the customer cannot void the warranty through “normal use for which it was intended” or “replacement of warranted parts with 3rd party parts”. I have had some experience as the Warranty Manager in a good sized business. However, where things go sour is when a manufacturer assumes that an owner is incompetent and the 3rd part parts are substandard, and either one of the two has created the failure of whatever it is that required the warranty.